facebook
rss
twitter
  • About
    • Contact
    • Elementary & Secondary Education Department
    • Social Concerns Department
  • Legislative Review
  • Issues
    • Catholic Education
    • Faith and Politics
    • Health Care
    • Life and Dignity
    • Marriage and Family
    • Religious Liberty
    • Social Justice
  • Bishops’ Statements
    • En Español
  • Resources
    • Bulletin Inserts
    • Church Documents
    • PA Catholic Statistics
    • Related Sites
    • Send A Letter to The Editor
  • Subscribe
    • RSS Feeds
    • Via E-mail
  • Contact
  • Podcast

Religious liberty threatened by sexual orientation bill

March 17, 2009
by Hill
discrimination, HB 300, legislation, marriage, Religious Liberty, sexual orientation
Comments are off

constitutionIn a fast track maneuver, legislation with the potential to threaten religious liberty narrowly advanced from the Pennsylvania House of Representatives State Government Committee with a 12 to 11 vote on March 11, 2009. The bill, known as HB 300, would add “sexual orientation and gender identity or expression” to the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act in an attempt to have them considered protected classes. The PHRA currently forbids discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations because of race, color, religious creed, ancestry, age, handicap or national origin.

Under the current statute, in some cases, religious organizations get an exemption to conduct their affairs on the basis of religious creed or gender when there is a “bona fide occupational qualification” to do so. HB 300 allows no exemptions.

The Pennsylvania Catholic Conference (PCC) opposes the legislation because of its potential threat to the religious liberty of organizations and individuals.

Robert J. O’Hara, Jr., Executive Director of the PCC said, “It is the position of the Catholic Church that every person should be treated with dignity and respect. Church teachings make a distinction, however, between someone having a homosexual orientation and homosexual behavior. House Bill 300, at the very least, blurs that distinction.”

“The effect of HB 300 is the potential exposure of a diocese or other Church ministry to litigation for acting in a manner consistent with Church teachings regarding homosexuality,” said O’Hara. “This bill constitutes an effort by the government to say to people that their moral code or their belief system must be abandoned – that those who disagree will be forced to conform or suffer monetary damages and legal processes if they do not, in their daily lives, embrace homosexuality.”

He pointed out some potential problems using schools as an example. The bill authorizes the development of a new curriculum in public schools dealing with sexual orientation and gender identity or expression. Although current state regulations permit parents to opt their children out of religiously objectionable instruction, regulations are easily subject to change. Opting-out itself could identify or brand a student as “homophobic.” Other states with similar measures have disallowed parents to opt out, resulting in a state mandate to teach students that their parents, who may object to the acceptance and promotion of homosexual conduct on religious grounds, are in effect “bigots.”

The proposal raises troubling religious liberty concerns for the Church as an employer and provider of key services that help the poor and vulnerable, and to all individuals whose religious beliefs do not condone homosexuality.

House State Government Committee roll call vote by diocese. A “yes” vote is in favor of the bill. A “no” vote reflects the PCC’s position.

ALLENTOWN DIOCESE

  • Jim Cox – no
  • Robert Freeman – yes

ERIE DIOCESE

  • Florindo J. Fabrizio – yes
  • Matt Gabler – no
  • Kathy L. Rapp – no
  • Brad Roae – no

GREENSBURG DIOCESE

  • Tim Krieger – no

HARRISBURG DIOCESE

  • Kerry A. Benninghoff – no (also Altoona-Johnstown Diocese)
  • Tom C. Creighton – no
  • Cheryl M. Delozier – no
  • Glen R. Grell – no
  • David R. Millard – no

PHILADELPHIA ARCHDIOCESE

  • Louise W. Bishop – yes
  • Brendan F. Boyle – yes
  • Lawrence H. Curry – yes
  • Mark B. Cohen – yes
  • Babette Josephs, Committee Chair – yes
  • Michael H. O’Brien – yes
  • Frank L. Oliver – yes
  • Marguerite Quinn – no
  • Greg Vitali – yes

PITTSBURGH DIOCESE

  • Dan Frankel – yes

SCRANTON DIOCESE

  • Mike Carroll – yes

Did not vote: PHILADELPHIA – John T. Galloway and Rick Taylor; PITTSBURGH – Jaret Gibbons

The next step for HB 300 is consideration by the House Appropriations Committee.

NEWS from the PCC March 12, 2009 by A.B. Hill, Communications Director of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference – the public affairs arm of Pennsylvania’s Catholic bishops and the Catholic dioceses of Pennsylvania.

Social Share
  • google-share

News From Around PA

  • St. Katharine of Siena School, Wayne, celebrates the start of the Phillies 2023 season (PHOTOS)
  • West Catholic boys’ basketball wins first-ever state title
  • Pope visits pediatric oncology ward, baptizes infant
  • Bishop Bambera Announces Clergy Appointments
  • Thomas DeAngelis Named President of Coal Township Catholic School
  • Director of Mercy Service, Center for Mercy Service, Carlow University
Click To Read More

Post Archives

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Recent Posts

PA Budget Hearings for Wednesday, 3-29-23
Mar 29, 2023
PA Budget Hearings for Tuesday, 3-28-23
Mar 29, 2023
Budget hearings at the PA Capitol
Mar 21, 2023

All Issues

  • Catholic Education
  • Faith and Politics
  • Health Care
  • Life and Dignity
  • Marriage and Family
  • Religious Liberty
  • Social Justice

banner

Sign up to join the Catholic Advocacy Network today!

CClogo© 2021 Pennsylvania Catholic Conference. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.
Bookmark and Share Site by Halibut Blue® | Login